After all, what are we to make of Marc Schlosser, the
physician-narrator? He is more than a little abnormal from page one. Most
people who become family doctors, internists, or general practioners—whatever
one calls them—have significant defenses built up to protect their psyches from
being grossed out by every single incident that occurs with medical contact with
the human body, whether in health, detritus, or decay. Not Marc Schlosser. He
is creeped out by nearly everything about the serious business of medicine. I
found him to be ghoulishly repulsive in this regard. And I thought that Koch
intends us to be repulsed, and to imagine our naked selves unclad on
Schlosser’s examining-room table. Horrid!
What is Schlosser seeking when he insinuates his entire
family into Ralph's (the great actor and movie star mogul) Mediterranean rental
commune? Is it to brush shoulders with Ralph’s fame? To see if he can find a way to imbibe Ralph’s incessant breaking of boundaries to recharge his (Schlossser’s) own
life and thus compensate for the daily suppression of self he suffers in his
medical practice? What??? I think Koch begs the reader to find an explanation
for Schlosser’s lunacy, or at the least, his off-balance intentions.
The crux of the novel, as it impends on the climax, focuses
on a murky mishap that involves or befalls Schlosser’s gorgeous 13-year-old
daughter Julia. Did Ralph really rape Julia, as Schlosser is convinced? Or is
Schlosser merely projecting his incestual predilictions onto Ralph? What do you
think?
How are we to view Schlosser's grotesque assault on Ralph's body in Schlosser's examining room? Is this a mere novel of horror? I ask you.
And what are we to make of Schlosser’s neon flashback to the
anti-homosexual lectures/rants of his medical school professor, which was for
Schlosser, an indoctrination into what was, for him, the horrors of anal
penetration?
In my review of The Dinner, I stated my convinction
that it was, among other things, an allegory. I suspect that Summer
House with Swimming Pool may be also—there’s just too much social
commentary for it not to be, to my mind. So what’s my problem? I don’t have a
clue what Koch is trying to say. Do you? Koch is definitely saying something in
this novel. What are your views? Please share them openly!
Wow! This book is waiting for me at the library, but I'm actually having second thoughts about reading it. It may be one of those books that I start and then can't look away, even if I want to...
ReplyDeleteHi, JoAnn,
DeleteI am sorry that my review has made you have second thoughts about reading Summer House. I can see why you (or I) wouldn't want to, but it would be interesting to have another person's point of view about the book. Perhaps I am not seeing things clearly? Perhaps you would have a different take on it. It would be fun to compare notes about it.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteGood Grief, Kathy!
DeleteI'm so sorry--I had no idea I deleted your comment! Yikes--sincere regret!
I was responding to your comment that the book did not sound like one for you--you said it so, so much better.
And my response is:
Kathy, I will say this for Summer House; it's certainly not a "cozy" thriller. But I do hope and wish that more people would read it because I'm not sorry I read it. I just wish I knew where Herman Koch was going with it. I sincerely wish to know.
Judith
Ohmigosh! I'm so sorry I'm just getting to your comment now. I wholeheartedly agree that Koch's books mirror issues in society! I believe many international readers may overlook this aspect.
ReplyDeleteThanks for responding!
This seems like a really tough sell in some ways! I think subjects like this require a lot of thought and maturity to tackle that some authors don't have. Do you think the book's central conflict, Julia and Ralph, was handled "well"? Does it ask the question in a thoughtful way? I hope so, I was thinking of reading it!
ReplyDeleteBernice Cunningham @ Guardian Industries